[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-54?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16187555#comment-16187555
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NETBEANS-54:
----------------------------------------
Github user dschoorl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/7
Hi Jan,
Thanks for reviewing again.
In no way, I am a legal expert. But I think that by providing the
jcip-license.txt file, we meet the requirements of the license stated in
article 4b (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/legalcode) and I think
no notice is needed? Why do you think needs the jcip license text be merged in
the jsr305 one? I believe this is also not done by the findbugs-community who
repackaged it with jsr305.jar.
Are these -license.txt files somehow processed automatically and do they
need a certain structure, such as having a License-tag? Is that described
somewhere?
> Clarify the status of donated files from ApacheNetBeansDonation1.zip
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NETBEANS-54
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-54
> Project: NetBeans
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
> Attachments: categorized-1.zip, convert-headers-1.zip,
> JavaApplication9.java
>
>
> Reviewing the software grant [1] provided with the first NetBeans code
> donation, my understanding is that not all files found in that zip are
> donated.
> The grant indicates that the contents of that file [2] ("Code File") are
> donated "excluding any third-party and separately licensed material contained
> within the Code File".
> I don't think we can consider that code ready to release as is, due to the
> uncertainty that this creates w.r.t to which files are donated and which are
> not.
> The zip archive contains about 45'000 files.
> I see the following options:
> a) Review all files and include only those which are not "third-party and
> separately licensed material". How such files are identified needs to be
> defined and documented, either in scripts under version control or as a set
> of rules. The review process must be documented and traceable, so that we can
> go back to it if problems are found in the future.
> b) Get an updated grant which does not mention such exclusions.
> If someone sees other options please discuss here or on the NetBeans dev
> list, referencing this ticket.
> [1] in svn under private/documents/grants/oracle-america-netbeans.pdf , ASF
> members have access
> [2] under http://bits.netbeans.org/download/apache-donation/ -
> SHA256(ApacheNetBeansDonation1.zip)=
> 7f2ca0f61953a190613c9a0fbcc1b034084b04a4d55d23c02cefffc354e7c24a
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
