[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15307157#comment-15307157
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-856:
-------------------------------------
Github user apiri commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/290#issuecomment-222586092
Hey @trixpan,
Scoped out your new changes and left a couple comments. Changes look good,
just had a question on whether the SSL Context should be made required and
there is, I believe, the unused message demarcator field. Let me know your
thoughts on those and we can get this incorporated and closed out.
Thanks!
> Add Processor for Lumberjack protocol
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-856
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-856
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Mike de Rhino
> Labels: features
> Attachments: NIFI-856.patch
>
>
> It would be great if NIFI could support the [lumberjack
> protocol|https://github.com/elastic/logstash-forwarder/blob/master/PROTOCOL.md]
> so to enable the use of logstash forwarder as a source of data.
> A lot of non Java shops tend to avoid installing Java at data producing nodes
> and instead of Flume they end up using things like kafka, heka, fluentd or
> logstash-forwarded as data shipping mechanisms.
> Kafka is great but its architecture seem to be better focused on multi-DC
> environments instead of multi-branch scenarios (imagine having to manager 80
> Zookeeper quorum, one for each country where you operate?)
> [Heka|https://github.com/mozilla-services/heka] is fine, it has decent
> backpressure buffering but no concept of acknowledgement on the receiving
> side of a TCP stream. If the other end of a TCP stream is capable of
> listening but gets stuck with its messages it will keep spitting data through
> the pipe, oblivious to the woes at the other end.
> Logstash forwarder in the other hand, is a quite simple tool, with a
> reasonable implementation of acknowledgments on the receiving side but... it
> depends on Logstash(and logstash has its own issues).
> It would be great if NIFI could serve as a middle man, receiving lumberjack
> messages and offloading some of the hard work Logstash seems to struggle with
> (e.g. using NIFI to save to HDFS while a downstream Logstash writes into ES).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
