[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15596069#comment-15596069
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on MINIFI-117:
---------------------------------------

Github user brosander commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/45#discussion_r84529455
  
    --- Diff: 
minifi-toolkit/minifi-toolkit-configuration/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/minifi/toolkit/configuration/ConfigMain.java
 ---
    @@ -96,13 +99,21 @@ public int validate(String[] args) {
             }
             try (InputStream inputStream = 
pathInputStreamFactory.create(args[1])) {
                 try {
    -                ConfigSchema configSchema = 
SchemaLoader.loadConfigSchemaFromYaml(inputStream);
    +                ConvertableSchema<ConfigSchema> configSchema = 
SchemaLoader.loadConvertableSchemaFromYaml(inputStream);
                     if (!configSchema.isValid()) {
                         configSchema.getValidationIssues().forEach(s -> 
System.out.println(s));
                         System.out.println();
                         return ERR_INVALID_CONFIG;
                     } else {
    -                    
System.out.println(NO_VALIDATION_ERRORS_FOUND_IN_TEMPLATE);
    +                    ConfigSchema currentSchema = configSchema.convert();
    --- End diff --
    
    I think it would, good call :)


> Maintainable Configuration Versioning
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MINIFI-117
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-117
>             Project: Apache NiFi MiNiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Bryan Rosander
>            Assignee: Bryan Rosander
>
> In order to avoid a tangled web of if/else statements around every possible 
> permutation of config.yml and an equally complicated validation routine, we 
> need to utilize a versioning strategy that allows for specific parsing and 
> validation code for each version of the ConfigSchema.
> This will allow us to determine if a schema will be compatible with an older 
> MiNiFi instance more easily by validating the structure of the file at a 
> given version while still supporting an upconvert on read to the latest 
> ConfigSchema while parsing at runtime.
> It should also facilitate a deprecation strategy of removing older versions' 
> classes without needing to touch current implementation



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to