[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15637703#comment-15637703
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MINIFI-107:
---------------------------------------
Github user JPercivall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/50#discussion_r86620366
--- Diff:
minifi-commons/minifi-commons-schema/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/minifi/commons/schema/RemoteProcessingGroupSchema.java
---
@@ -50,17 +48,18 @@
public RemoteProcessingGroupSchema(Map map) {
name = getRequiredKeyAsType(map, NAME_KEY, String.class,
REMOTE_PROCESSING_GROUPS_KEY);
- url = getRequiredKeyAsType(map, URL_KEY, String.class,
REMOTE_PROCESSING_GROUPS_KEY);
- inputPorts = convertListToType(getRequiredKeyAsType(map,
INPUT_PORTS_KEY, List.class, REMOTE_PROCESSING_GROUPS_KEY), "input port",
RemoteInputPortSchema.class, INPUT_PORTS_KEY);
+ String wrapperName = "RemoteProcessingGroup(name:
{name})".replace("{name}", StringUtil.isNullOrEmpty(name) ? "unknown" : name);
--- End diff --
This may be a basic question but why use ".replace" (which compiles a
pattern) instead of just doing string concatenation?
> Support for Process Groups
> --------------------------
>
> Key: MINIFI-107
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-107
> Project: Apache NiFi MiNiFi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Bryan Rosander
> Assignee: Bryan Rosander
>
> Process groups are a good way to simplify the design part of development in
> NiFi. MiNiFi Java currently doesn't support them but should in order to make
> designing templates compatible with MiNiFi a better experience.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
