This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

joewitt pushed a change to tag HDF-3.4.0.21-1-tag
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nifi.git


*** WARNING: tag HDF-3.4.0.21-1-tag was deleted! ***

     was 29b07e60cd HOTFIX-4216 NIFI-7469: Updated RepositoryRecord to include 
flag indicating whether or not the content of a FlowFile was modified. This 
allows us to explicitly keep track of this state rather than implying it 
(potentially incorrectly).

This change permanently discards the following revisions:

 discard 29b07e60cd HOTFIX-4216 NIFI-7469: Updated RepositoryRecord to include 
flag indicating whether or not the content of a FlowFile was modified. This 
allows us to explicitly keep track of this state rather than implying it 
(potentially incorrectly).
 discard 10c3b6b40a HOTFIX-4216 NIFI-6846: If an Exception is thrown while a 
Processor is writing to a FlowFile, but that Content Claim is not yet eligible 
for destruction, mark it as a transient claim on the RepositoryRecord so that 
if it's available when the FlowFile Repository is checkpointed, then it will be 
cleaned up then
 discard 6282b81372 HOTFIX-4216 NIFI-6150: Moved logic of decrementing content 
claims from ProcessSession.commit to the FlowFile Repository. Also updated 
load-balancing protocol and queue drop logic to no longer decrement content 
claims since the flowfile repo will handle the logic. This allows us ts to 
ensure that the claimant counts are decremented only if the repo is 
successfully updated and still before checking if the claim is still in use or 
not.
 discard 005d58536d HOTFIX-4216 Contains the following changes: * NIFI-7079 
security fix * NIFI-6085 - need for sec fix * NIFI-6280 - need for sec fix * 
additional changes which needed for successful build
 discard 6f2ceecd18 HOTFIX-4216 NIFI-7023 This closes #3991. Removed SLF4J and 
Log4J transitive dependencies from Zookeeper so tests log correctly. Changed 
template handling. Added unit tests.
 discard 7f7c0e371d HOTFIX-4216 Fix build issue

Reply via email to