patacongo commented on pull request #1079:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/1079#issuecomment-631401833


   > > In past conversation you had told me that readability was more important 
than line length and that long lines were OK in arch headers. The code base 
reflected that.
   > 
   > I have no recollection of that in the past. But we cut a lot of corners in 
the past that we no longer do.
   
   @davids5 I think I know what this is about.  Header files do typically have 
longer lines than C source files.  But that doesn't make excessively long lines 
more acceptable in header files.
   
   There have been changes in nxstyle from several months ago that you may not 
be aware of.  The old nxstyle used a fixed, default line width of 78 (unless 
you overrode that with the -m option).  But that logic has been relaced.  It 
now determines the line width dynamically using the width of the block comment 
"rulers."
   
   So a long line error means that a line has extended beyond the rulers.  That 
should be reported as an error regardless of the file type.
   
   I don't think this effects the readability of the header files unless people 
cram too much garbage in the right hand comments.  Then the readability is bad 
in any case.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to