nuttxpr commented on PR #13540: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/13540#issuecomment-2360513533
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13494&type=pullrequests) __Squash The Commits:__ This PR contains 2 Commits. Please Squash the Multiple Commits into a Single Commit. ## NuttX PR Requirements Review This PR appears **incomplete** and does not meet the NuttX requirements. Here's why: **Summary:** * While the summary describes the technical changes, it lacks a clear explanation of **why** these changes are necessary. What problem does this solve? * The summary mentions errors encountered but doesn't elaborate on the root cause. * It's unclear what "existed code" wasn't updated and why. **Impact:** * **Incomplete:** The impact section only mentions "drivers/sensors" but needs a more detailed analysis. * **User Impact:** Will users need to modify their applications due to the type changes? * **Build Impact:** The errors indicate a build impact. The description should explain how the build process is affected and if any specific configurations are impacted. * **Hardware Impact:** Are there any specific architectures, boards, or drivers affected by these changes? * **Documentation:** Is documentation impacted? If so, has it been updated? * **Other impacts (Security, Compatibility):** These are not addressed and should be analyzed. **Testing:** * **Insufficient:** The PR acknowledges a lack of testing due to unavailable hardware. While CI compilation is helpful, it doesn't replace actual functional testing. * **Missing Logs:** The "Testing logs before change" and "Testing logs after change" sections are empty. **Recommendations:** 1. **Explain the "Why":** Clearly articulate the reason and benefits of these changes. 2. **Root Cause Analysis:** Explain why the existing code wasn't updated and the challenges involved. 3. **Complete Impact Analysis:** Thoroughly analyze and document the impact on all aspects (users, build, hardware, documentation, security, compatibility). 4. **Testing Plan:** If hardware is unavailable, outline a testing plan for when it's accessible. Consider alternative testing methods like simulation or mocking. 5. **Provide Context:** Give enough information for reviewers to understand the changes without needing to look at the linked commits. By addressing these points, you'll significantly improve the PR's quality and facilitate a smoother review process. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
