nuttxpr commented on PR #13546:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/13546#issuecomment-2361854435

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13494&type=pullrequests)
   
   __Squash The Commits:__ This PR contains 3 Commits. Please Squash the 
Multiple Commits into a Single Commit.
   
   
   
   ## NuttX PR Requirements Review
   
   This PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements. Here's a breakdown:
   
   **Summary:**
   
   * **Clear explanation of the change:** The summary clearly states the 
purpose of the change, addressing a fix for the backtrace dump functionality 
specifically for Espressif SoCs. 
   * **Functional area:**  The affected area is clearly identified (stack and 
backtrace dump for xtensa/esp32).
   * **Mechanism:**  The summary outlines how the change works, including fixes 
to the `MAKE_PC_FROM_RA` macro, sanity checks, and script updates.
   * **Issue references:** While not explicitly mentioned, the summary implies 
addressing an existing issue with backtrace dumps on the mentioned 
architectures. It would be beneficial to add specific issue references if 
applicable.
   
   **Impact:**
   
   * **Feature change:** This PR focuses on fixing an existing feature 
(backtrace dump), not introducing a new one.
   * **User impact:** No user-facing changes are described, implying minimal 
impact.
   * **Build impact:** No build process changes are mentioned.
   * **Hardware impact:** The changes are specific to Xtensa-based devices, 
specifically ESP32 and its variants, which is clearly stated.
   * **Documentation impact:** The summary explicitly mentions updating 
documentation for each affected chip. 
   * **Security impact:** No security implications are mentioned.
   * **Compatibility impact:**  No backward or forward compatibility issues are 
mentioned.
   
   **Testing:**
   
   * **Verification:** The author confirms testing on local setup with positive 
results. 
   * **Host and Target:**  While "Internal CI testing" is mentioned,  listing 
specific host OS, compiler versions, and target boards used for testing would 
strengthen the validation.
   * **Logs:** The PR provides clear steps to reproduce the issue and verify 
the fix on an ESP32. Including snippets of actual logs before and after the 
change would further enhance the testing section.
   
   **Overall:**
   
   This PR demonstrates a good understanding of NuttX requirements.  Adding 
specific issue references and detailing the testing environment would further 
strengthen it. 
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to