nuttxpr commented on PR #13569: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/13569#issuecomment-2367082128
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Let's analyze if the provided PR summary meets the NuttX requirements. **Strengths:** * **Clear Reversion:** It states the PR reverts a specific commit (236678d730220138416724d2cab25d6e1bd2ce9d) which is good practice. * **Signed-off-by:** Includes the contributor's sign-off. **Weaknesses and Missing Information:** * **Insufficient "Why":** The summary mentions reverting a fix for warnings but doesn't adequately explain *why* this reversion is necessary. What problems did the original fix introduce? * **Vague Description:** "move private define to public" is too vague. What define? Why was it moved? * **Missing Functional Context:** It doesn't specify which functional area of the code is affected (e.g., scheduling, toolchain, a specific driver). * **No Issue References:** Are there related NuttX issues or pull requests? Providing links adds valuable context. * **Incomplete Impact Assessment:** "N/A" for Impact is rarely accurate. Even reversions can have consequences: * **Compatibility:** Does this reversion reintroduce compatibility issues addressed by the original commit? * **Build:** Did the original commit introduce build process changes that are now being reverted? * **Insufficient Testing Details:** "ci-check" is not enough information. * **Specifics:** What build hosts and target architectures were tested? * **Log Snippets:** Instead of full logs, provide relevant excerpts highlighting the problem before the revert and the improvement after. **Verdict:** This PR summary does **not** fully meet the NuttX requirements. It needs significant improvement in explaining the reasoning for the change, providing context about the affected code, and giving a thorough account of the testing performed. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
