nuttxpr commented on PR #14116:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14116#issuecomment-2407060188

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   Let's analyze this Pull Request against the NuttX requirements:
   
   **Summary:**
   
   * **GOOD:** The summary clearly states the problem ("cu assert when use ctrl 
+ c") and the affected area ("nxtask_terminate").
   * **NEEDS IMPROVEMENT:**  The "How" section is very technical.  A 
higher-level explanation would be better:
       * **Instead of:** "Swap the nxtask_recover() & 
nxsched_remove_readytorun()"
       * **Consider:** "The order of operations during thread termination was 
causing a race condition. The fix reorders these operations to prevent the 
assert."
   * **MISSING:**
       *  Include the related NuttX Issue number. This helps track the bug and 
links the PR to the original problem report.
   
   **Impact:**
   
   * **INCOMPLETE:** 
       * **"nxtask_terminate"**  is not a helpful description. What is the 
broader impact?  Does this affect only the `cu` tool, or could other areas be 
impacted by this change? 
       * **Consider each impact category:** Explicitly state "NO" or provide a 
brief explanation if "YES" for *all* impact areas:
          *  Feature changes
          *  User impact
          *  Build process
          *  Hardware/architecture
          *  Documentation 
          *  Security
          *  Compatibility 
   
   **Testing:**
   
   * **INCOMPLETE:**
       * **Build Hosts:** Specify the operating system, compiler version, and 
CPU architecture you used for testing.  For example: "Linux (Ubuntu 22.04), GCC 
11.3.0, x86_64"
       * **Targets:** Provide specifics about the boards and configurations 
tested:
          * **Example:** "sim:qemu-arm, vela:stm32f4discovery" 
       * **Testing Logs:** The logs are placeholders. Include *actual* log 
snippets from *before* and *after* the change, demonstrating the problem and 
the fix. 
   
   **Overall:**
   
   This PR is a good start, but it needs more detail and completeness to meet 
the NuttX requirements. Pay close attention to the "Impact" section and provide 
specific testing information. 
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to