nuttxpr commented on PR #14214: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14214#issuecomment-2409687306
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Let's break down if this NuttX Pull Request (PR) summary meets the requirements: **Meeting the Requirements?** * **Partially:** The PR summary provides some information, but it lacks crucial details. **What's Good:** * **Change Necessity:** You clearly state the change is specific to `esp32s3/partition` and involves inspecting MTD partitions and relocating enums. * **Functional Area:** You specify the exact code sections (`esp32s3/partition`, `ota_img_ctrl_e`, `ota_img_bootseq_e`). * **Target:** You mention the PR only impacts `esp32s3`. * **Testing:** You indicate testing was done on `esp32s3-devkitc`, but no logs are provided. **What Needs Improvement:** * **Why is this change necessary?** * Is there a bug being fixed? * Is this a new feature to support MTD text partitions? * Why do the enums need relocation (accessibility, code organization)? * **How does the change work?** * Be more specific about the inspection process. What determines if a partition is "mapped as text"? * Where are the enums being moved *to*? Just saying "a directory visible to the application" is too vague. * **Impact Section:** * **New Feature/Existing Change:** Is this a new feature, or does it modify an existing one? * **User Impact:** Will users need to change their applications or configurations due to the relocated enums? * **Build Impact:** Will any build steps, configurations, or dependencies change? * **Documentation:** Do any code comments, API docs, or user guides need updates to reflect these changes? * **Testing:** * **Build Host Details:** Specify the OS, compiler, and their versions used for testing. * **Testing Logs:** Provide the requested "before" and "after" logs to demonstrate the change's effect. **Revised Summary Example:** ``` ## Summary This PR addresses an issue on the `esp32s3` where the current OTA update mechanism does not correctly handle MTD partitions formatted as text. To resolve this: 1. **MTD Text Partition Inspection:** The `esp32s3/partition` code is modified to inspect the `factory`, `ota_0`, and `ota_1` partitions to determine if they are using a text-based file system (e.g., SPIFFS). 2. **Enum Relocation:** The `ota_img_ctrl_e` and `ota_img_bootseq_e` enums, previously in a platform-specific location, are moved to `arch/esp32s3/include/esp32s3/ota.h` to provide consistent access for applications performing OTA updates. This change ensures correct handling of text-based MTD partitions during OTA updates, improving compatibility with various file system configurations. ## Impact * **Existing Feature Change:** Modifies the OTA update process on `esp32s3`. * **User Impact:** YES. Applications using the relocated OTA enums will need to update their include paths. * **Build Impact:** NO. * **Hardware Impact:** Only impacts `esp32s3` boards. * **Documentation:** YES. The OTA update documentation will be updated to describe the MTD partition inspection and the new location of the OTA enums. * **Security Impact:** NO. * **Compatibility Impact:** This improves forward compatibility by supporting a wider range of MTD configurations. ## Testing * **Build Host:** Ubuntu 20.04, GCC 9.4.0 * **Target:** `esp32s3-devkitc` **Testing Logs (Before):** [Provide relevant log snippets showing the issue] **Testing Logs (After):** [Provide log snippets demonstrating the fix] ``` By providing this level of detail, you make it much easier for reviewers to understand the purpose, implementation, and impact of your changes, leading to a smoother and faster review process. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
