nuttxpr commented on PR #14294: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14294#issuecomment-2413058147
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) ## NuttX PR Requirements Review This PR appears **incomplete** based on the provided information. **Here's a breakdown:** **Summary:** * **Insufficient Information:** While the summary outlines the changes made, it lacks crucial context. * **Why are these changes necessary?** * Are there specific bugs being fixed? * Is this enhancing maintainability or readability? * Is there a performance improvement goal? * **How do the 'depends on' additions impact functionality?** Explain the reasoning behind these dependencies. * **Missing Issue References:** Are there related NuttX or NuttX Apps issues that this PR addresses? If so, provide links. **Impact:** * **Too Vague:** "Should be minimal" is not descriptive enough. Address each impact point specifically: * **User Impact:** Will users notice any functional changes? Will any configuration options change? * **Build Impact:** Will build times change? Are new build dependencies introduced? * **Hardware Impact:** Will any existing hardware configurations break? * **Documentation Impact:** Does the documentation need updating to reflect these changes? * **Security Impact:** Do these changes have any implications for the security of NuttX? * **Compatibility Impact:** Will this break compatibility with older NuttX versions or configurations? * **Consider Edge Cases:** Even if the impact *seems* minimal, think about less common scenarios that might be affected. **Testing:** * **Missing Details:** * **Host Information:** Provide specifics about your build host (OS version, compiler version, etc.). * **Target Information:** Clearly state the target architecture, board, and configuration used for testing. * **Logs Required:** Include actual build and runtime logs from both *before* and *after* the changes. This provides concrete evidence that your changes work as intended. * **CI Passing Is Not Enough:** While CI passing is good, it doesn't replace detailed testing documentation. **Recommendations:** 1. **Expand the Summary:** Provide a more comprehensive explanation of the changes and their motivations. 2. **Address All Impact Points:** Be specific and thorough in describing the potential impact of this PR. 3. **Provide Detailed Testing Information:** Include specific host/target details and the requested logs. **By addressing these points, you'll make your PR much stronger and easier for reviewers to understand and approve.** -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
