nuttxpr commented on PR #2794: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2794#issuecomment-2441942076
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) **Yes, but lacks detail.** Here's a breakdown: **Strengths:** * **Summary:** Provides a basic idea of the change. * **Testing:** Mentions CI, implying automated tests are run. **Weaknesses:** * **Summary:** * Lacks specifics on the "why" (bug fix, performance improvement?). * Doesn't explain what `work_xx_wq()` is or how it relates to the existing API. * **Impact:** * Overly vague. Saying "wqueue test case" doesn't clarify if anything beyond the test itself is affected. * **Testing:** * **CI alone is insufficient.** The PR needs to specify: * Which build hosts and target architectures were *manually* tested. * Snippets of relevant log output demonstrating the problem before and the solution after the change. **To improve this PR:** 1. **Expand the Summary:** Clearly articulate the problem being solved or the improvement being made. Explain the role of `work_xx_wq()` and how it changes the wqueue API usage. 2. **Be Specific in Impact:** * Does this change ONLY affect the test, or are there user-facing implications? * Will any existing code using the old wqueue API break (backward compatibility)? * Are there build system changes required to use the new API? 3. **Detailed Testing:** * List the exact host OS, compiler, target architectures, and boards used for testing. * Include relevant log excerpts showing the issue before and the fix after. By addressing these points, the PR will become much stronger and easier for reviewers to assess. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
