nuttxpr commented on PR #2846: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2846#issuecomment-2473390988
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it identifies a build issue and appears to fix it, it severely lacks critical information. Here's why: * **Insufficient Summary:** The summary only shows a compiler error. It doesn't explain *why* the error occurred, *what* change was made to fix it, *how* the fix works, or if any related NuttX issues exist. What was the root cause of the missing header? Was a path incorrect? Was a dependency missing? Was the header added? How? * **Incomplete Impact Assessment:** While "bugfix" is a start, it's too vague. Which architectures/boards does this fix affect? Are there any implications for users (do they need to rebuild anything)? Does it change anything in the build system itself? Documentation? * **Missing Testing Details:** It mentions a build command but provides no actual *logs*. We need to see build output *before* the change showing the failure and *after* the change demonstrating the successful build. "build pass" is not sufficient evidence. Crucially, it also lacks details about the *host* build environment. **In short, the PR needs to provide a clear explanation of the problem, the solution, and verifiable evidence that the solution works.** Simply stating there was a compile error and it's now fixed is not enough information for proper review and integration. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
