yamt commented on code in PR #14901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14901#discussion_r1853385050
##########
fs/littlefs/lfs_vfs.c:
##########
@@ -816,16 +834,31 @@ static int littlefs_fchstat(FAR const struct file *filep,
inode = filep->f_inode;
fs = inode->i_private;
+ path = lib_get_pathbuffer();
+ if (path == NULL)
+ {
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
/* Call LFS to get file size */
+ ret = littlefs_convert_result(lfs_file_path(&fs->lfs, &priv->file, path,
Review Comment:
well, i have even suggested an alternative way to implement it months ago.
(https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11724#issuecomment-2116644633)
are you suggesting it's my responsibility to actually implement it? why?
it's up to the people who added the code, not me, IMO.
i can understand the ability to use the other version of littlefs is not
important for some people.
but for me it's more important than these features.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
