nuttxpr commented on PR #14932: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14932#issuecomment-2497752976
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a summary and mentions testing, it lacks crucial details. Here's a breakdown of what's missing: * **Summary:** While it states the change ("use inline replace macro"), the *why* is vague ("enhance compatibility"). Which compilers are problematic? What specific compatibility issues are being addressed? How does an inline macro solve this? Links to related issues are missing. * **Impact:** The impact section is far too brief. It just mentions "spinlock" which doesn't tell us anything. All the "NO/YES" questions need to be answered explicitly. Even if the answer is NO, it should be stated. For example: "Impact on user: NO". If there are any YES answers, a description is *required*. * **Testing:** "ci ostest" is insufficient. What platform was this tested on (host and target)? Which compiler version? What do "ostest" results actually show? The requirement specifically asks for "Testing logs before change" and "Testing logs after change". Simply saying "ci ostest" doesn't demonstrate what changed or that the change was successful. Provide concrete examples of the problematic behavior *before* the change and how it's resolved *after* the change. The PR needs to be significantly more detailed to meet the NuttX requirements. Provide specific information for each section to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the change and its impact. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
