nuttxpr commented on PR #14933: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14933#issuecomment-2497991813
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR summary does not adequately meet the NuttX requirements. Here's why and how to fix it: **Missing Information in Summary:** * **Why is this change necessary?** The summary only describes *what* the change is (adding a singleton class for macros), but not *why*. Is this for easier access to macros within GDB scripts? Does it solve a specific problem or improve usability? This is the most critical missing piece. * **What functional part of the code is being changed?** `tools/gdb` is mentioned, but more detail is needed. Which scripts or functionalities within `tools/gdb` utilize this new class? * **How does the change exactly work?** The example shows *how to use* the class, but not how it *works*. Does it parse Kconfig files? Does it rely on some other mechanism? A brief technical explanation is needed. * **Related Issues:** Are there any related NuttX or NuttX Apps issues that this PR addresses? If not, explicitly state "None." **Missing Information in Impact:** The entire Impact section is empty. You *must* address each point, even if the answer is "NO." For example: * **Is new feature added?** YES * **Is existing feature changed?** Likely NO, but clarify. * **Impact on user:** YES (Explain how GDB users will be affected. Will they need to change existing scripts?) * **Impact on build:** NO * **Impact on hardware:** NO * **Impact on documentation:** YES (If this new feature needs to be documented, state that documentation is included. If not, explain why.) * **Impact on security:** NO (Unless there's a reason to believe otherwise) * **Impact on compatibility:** NO (Unless there's a reason to believe otherwise) * **Anything else to consider?** (Possibly not, but consider it carefully.) **Missing Information in Testing:** * **Build Host(s):** Provide details about your build host OS, CPU architecture, and compiler version. * **Target(s):** `sim` is too vague. Specify which simulator (e.g., `qemu-system-arm`). Also specify the board configuration used (e.g., `sim:nsh`). * **Testing logs before change:** Include actual logs showing the behavior before your change. What problem were you experiencing, or what was missing? * **Testing logs after change:** Show how your change fixes the problem or adds the desired functionality. Demonstrate the usage of the new macro class and its impact on the GDB output. **Example of a better Summary:** "tools/gdb: Add a singleton class for accessing Kconfig macros within GDB scripts. This simplifies access to build-time configurations within GDB, making it easier to write conditional debugging scripts. The `Macro` class parses the NuttX `.config` file and provides access to configuration symbols as class attributes. This addresses the difficulty in currently accessing these values, as described in [NuttX Issue #XXX] (or "None"). This change affects the `tools/gdb/` scripts and adds the `Macro` class in a new Python module." By providing the missing information and addressing all the points in the template, your PR will be much more likely to be reviewed and accepted. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
