nuttxpr commented on PR #15095:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15095#issuecomment-2527993082

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides 
some information, it lacks crucial details.
   
   Here's what's missing:
   
   * **Summary:**  While it mentions *what* changed (removing extra spaces), it 
doesn't explain *why*.  Was this for code style consistency?  Was it causing a 
problem? Which files were affected?  This section needs more context.  
Mentioning the specific files or directory affected would be very helpful.
   * **Impact:**  While saying "none" is concise, it's likely not entirely 
accurate.  Even whitespace changes *can* have an impact, especially if they 
affect code generation (though unlikely in this case).  It's better to be 
explicit and say something like:
       * Impact on user: NO
       * Impact on build: NO (No changes to build process or dependencies)
       * Impact on hardware: NO
       * Impact on documentation: NO
       * Impact on security: NO
       * Impact on compatibility: NO
       * Anything else to consider: NO
   
   * **Testing:**  "local nxstyle" is insufficient. This only confirms style 
compliance, not functionality.  What part of NuttX was tested?  Were any 
applications or drivers impacted by these changes?  Even if the changes are 
purely cosmetic, some basic functional tests should be run and the results 
provided (even if they are identical before and after).  Ideally, there would 
be *before* and *after* logs showing that the system functions as expected, or 
specific test cases demonstrating that the extra spaces were causing a problem 
(if that was the motivation for the change).  Specify the host OS, target 
architecture, and board/configuration used for testing.
   
   
   In short, the PR needs to be more thorough in justifying the change, 
outlining potential impacts (even if they're negative), and providing concrete 
testing evidence beyond just style checking.  While whitespace cleanup is 
important, the PR needs to demonstrate that it doesn't introduce any unintended 
consequences.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to