nuttxpr commented on PR #15136: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15136#issuecomment-2535096579
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a summary and mentions testing, it lacks crucial details. Here's what's missing: * **Summary:** Needs more detail. *Why* do you want to replace the critical section with a lock? What problem does this solve? What specific changes are being made (e.g., "Replacing `enter_critical_section()` and `leave_critical_section()` with calls to `nxmutex_take()` and `nxmutex_give()` on a newly introduced mutex")? * **Impact:** The current entry is insufficient. Address *all* the impact points with "YES" or "NO" and provide descriptions where necessary. Consider: * **Impact on user:** Likely no, but explain why. * **Impact on build:** Possibly no, but state explicitly. * **Impact on hardware:** Probably no, but state explicitly. * **Impact on documentation:** If no documentation changes are needed, state that explicitly. * **Impact on security:** Does using a mutex instead of a critical section have any security implications? (e.g., priority inversion). * **Impact on compatibility:** Are there any backward compatibility concerns? * **Testing:** "ci" is not sufficient. Provide specific details about the build host (OS, CPU architecture, compiler) and the target platform (architecture, board, configuration). Include *actual* testing logs demonstrating the issue before the change and the improved behavior after the change. Just saying "works as intended" is not enough; show evidence. The PR needs to be significantly expanded to meet the requirements. Provide the missing information to ensure a thorough review. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
