nuttxpr commented on PR #15176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15176#issuecomment-2540871595

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   No. This PR summary lacks crucial information.  While it links to the PR 
itself, the requirements ask for a *summary* within the PR description, not 
just a title and link.  The requirements ask for:
   
   * **Why** is the change necessary? What problem does it solve?  "Avoid 
invalid access" is a symptom, not a root cause. Explain *what* was being 
accessed invalidly and under what circumstances.
   * **What** functional part of the code changed?  Be more specific than 
`binfmt/exec`.  Which function(s), data structures, etc., were modified?
   * **How** does the initialization prevent the invalid access?
   
   The impact section is also insufficient.  "RELEASE" doesn't explain 
anything.  While it *might* mean this is a bug fix for a release branch, it 
doesn't address any of the specific impact questions.  Each "NO" or "YES" 
should be followed by a justification, even if it's a brief "N/A".  For 
example, *Impact on user: NO - This is an internal bug fix.*
   
   Finally, "CI" for testing is inadequate.  The requirements explicitly ask 
for details about the build host and target platform(s), as well as *actual 
test logs* demonstrating the problem before the change and the correct behavior 
after the change.  Just saying "CI" doesn't prove anything; the CI logs 
themselves should be referenced or included (if short).
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to