nuttxpr commented on PR #15213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15213#issuecomment-2547099751

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   No, this PR description does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it 
provides some information, it lacks crucial details.  Here's a breakdown:
   
   **Missing/Insufficient Information:**
   
   * **Summary:**
       * While it mentions using atomic operations and fixing a regression, it 
doesn't explain *what* `f_refs` is, *why* it needs atomic protection, and *how* 
the atomic operations achieve this protection.  What was the specific issue 
caused by the regression?
       * It mentions including another PR (#15202).  This should be clarified – 
is this PR dependent on #15202?  Does it supersede #15202?  Simply stating 
"includes" is ambiguous.
   
   * **Impact:**
       *  "RELEASE" is not descriptive enough.  Does this mean it affects a 
release branch?  Which one?  The Impact section requires "YES/NO" answers for 
each category followed by descriptions if "YES." At minimum, it needs to 
explicitly address each of the impact categories (user, build, hardware, 
documentation, security, compatibility).  Even if the answer is NO, it should 
state "NO."
   
   * **Testing:**
       * "CI" is also insufficient.  While Continuous Integration testing is 
valuable, the requirements specifically ask for details about *local* testing.  
What host and target platforms were tested? What specific tests were run?  The 
provided log sections are empty.  Real testing logs are needed to demonstrate 
the fix and that it doesn't introduce new issues.
   
   **How to Improve:**
   
   1. **Elaborate on the Summary:** Explain what `f_refs` represents and its 
function. Describe the specific issue the regression introduced (e.g., race 
conditions, crashes, data corruption). Explain how using atomic operations 
resolves the problem.  Clarify the relationship with PR #15202.
   
   2. **Complete the Impact Assessment:**  Address *all* impact categories with 
"YES/NO" and provide explanations for any "YES" responses.  If there is no 
impact in a category, explicitly state "NO."  For "RELEASE," specify which 
release is affected.
   
   3. **Provide Detailed Testing Information:** List the specific build host(s) 
and target(s) used for testing, including OS, CPU architecture, compiler, and 
board/configuration details.  Include actual testing logs (or relevant 
snippets) demonstrating the problem before the change and the correct behavior 
after the change.  Even if CI tests pass, demonstrating local testing is 
essential for review.
   
   
   By providing this missing information, the PR will meet the NuttX 
requirements and be easier for reviewers to understand and evaluate.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to