nuttxpr commented on PR #15218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15218#issuecomment-2547206452

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although the provided 
information is minimal.
   
   **Strengths:**
   
   * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the *why*, *what*, and *how* of 
the change, referencing relevant precedent.
   * **Impact Acknowledged:** The "RELEASE" impact suggests a version bump is 
needed, which is a significant impact.
   * **Testing Mentioned:**  "CI" implies Continuous Integration testing was 
performed, which is good, but more detail is desirable.
   
   **Weaknesses (and how to improve them):**
   
   * **Impact Under-specified:** While "RELEASE" highlights a version change, 
more details are needed.  Consider addressing other impact categories 
explicitly (even if the answer is "NO").  For a license change, backward 
compatibility is especially relevant.
   * **Testing Insufficiently Detailed:** "CI" is too vague. Specify which CI 
systems were used, which targets were tested, and ideally provide links to the 
CI run logs.  The requirement asks for "Testing logs before change" and 
"Testing logs after change" which are missing.  While a license change might 
not have functional output differences, showing successful builds on 
representative platforms before/after would strengthen the PR.
   
   
   **In short:** The PR meets the *letter* of the requirements but not fully 
the *spirit*.  Adding more specifics, especially regarding testing and the full 
impact of the license change, will make it much stronger.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to