nuttxpr commented on PR #15219: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15219#issuecomment-2547333785
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides *some* information, it lacks crucial details. Here's a breakdown of what's missing: * **Summary:** It mentions *what* is being changed (replacing a critical section with a small lock) but not *why* this is necessary. What problem does this solve? What are the benefits (e.g., performance improvement, reduced interrupt latency)? It also lacks specifics on *how* the change is implemented. Which functions are modified? Are new functions introduced? Are there any algorithm changes? Finally, issue references are missing. * **Impact:** The single word "gpio" is insufficient. It needs to explicitly answer *all* the impact questions (user, build, hardware, documentation, security, compatibility) with "YES" or "NO" and provide descriptions where necessary. Even if the answer is "NO," it should still explicitly state "NO." For example, "Impact on user: NO" or "Impact on hardware: YES (affects all platforms using GPIO)." * **Testing:** "ci" is not acceptable. The PR needs to specify the *specific* build hosts and targets tested. OS, CPU architecture, compiler, board, and configuration details are all required. Critically, it's missing the **actual testing logs** before and after the change, which are essential for demonstrating that the change works as intended and doesn't introduce regressions. In short, the PR needs substantially more detail to be acceptable. It should clearly articulate the motivation, implementation, and impact of the change, along with thorough testing evidence. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
