nuttxpr commented on PR #15222: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15222#issuecomment-2547468625
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a basic summary, it lacks crucial details. Here's a breakdown of what's missing: * **Summary:** While the "what" is mentioned (replacing big lock with small lock), the *why* and *how* are insufficient. Why is the big lock problematic? What specific lock is being used as the small lock? How does this change affect the interaction of the RTC driver with other parts of the system? No related issue references are provided. * **Impact:** Simply stating "lc823450_rtc" is not enough. This section requires YES/NO answers for each impact area, followed by a description if the answer is YES. For example, does this change affect any existing users of the RTC driver? Does it change the build process, affect other hardware, require documentation updates, have security implications, or impact compatibility? These all need to be explicitly addressed. * **Testing:** "ci" is not sufficient testing information. What specific CI environment was used? What architectures and boards were tested? The requirement asks for logs *before* and *after* the change to demonstrate the improvement. Provide host OS, CPU, compiler, target architecture, board configuration, and actual log output showing the behavior before and after the change. The PR needs substantial revision to meet the NuttX requirements. It must provide specific details for each section, especially regarding the rationale behind the change, the impact assessment, and thorough testing information. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
