nuttxpr commented on PR #15291: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15291#issuecomment-2553888629
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides some information, it lacks crucial details. Here's what's missing: * **Summary:** The summary is too vague. It needs to explain *why* a smaller lock is desired (e.g., performance improvement, reduced interrupt latency). It also needs to describe *how* the change is implemented (e.g., replacing `nxsem_wait` with `nxsem_trywait`, using a spinlock instead of a semaphore). * **Impact:** The impact section is severely lacking. It simply repeats "imx9_lpuart." It needs to address *all* the points listed in the requirements template. For example: * **Is new feature added? Is existing feature changed?** This is a change to an existing feature. * **Impact on user:** Potentially yes, if the change affects performance. This needs to be investigated and documented. * **Impact on build:** Likely no, but this should be explicitly stated. * **Impact on hardware:** Specific to the imx9 architecture. * **Impact on documentation:** Potentially yes, if the locking behavior is documented. * **Impact on security/compatibility:** These need to be addressed, even if the answer is no. * **Testing:** "ci" is insufficient. The testing section needs to include: * Specific build host details (OS, compiler version, etc.). * Specific target details (board, configuration). * **Actual logs** demonstrating the behavior before and after the change. Simply stating "ci" doesn't provide any evidence that the change works as intended. The PR needs significant revision to meet the NuttX requirements. It needs to be more specific and provide detailed information about the change, its impact, and the testing performed. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
