nuttxpr commented on PR #2908: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2908#issuecomment-2554985744
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR description does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides some information, it lacks crucial details in several sections. Here's a breakdown of what's missing and how it can be improved: **Summary:** * **Missing:** While it mentions adding support for speed sensors, it doesn't specify *why* this change is necessary. Is it a new feature request? Does it fix a bug? It also lacks details about *how* the change works. What specific code was modified? What algorithms or drivers were implemented or changed? Finally, linking a related NuttX issue would be beneficial if one exists. **Example of a better Summary:** > This PR adds support for speed sensors to the `sensortest` utility, addressing a feature request from [link to issue if applicable]. Currently, `sensortest` does not handle speed sensor data. This implementation adds a new command-line option to `sensortest` to read and display data from speed sensors using the existing sensor framework. The `read_sensor` function is modified to recognize and handle speed sensor data. **Impact:** * **Insufficient Detail:** While mentioning user impact, it lacks specifics. How *exactly* will the user interact with this new feature? Are there new command-line options? The other impact categories are completely omitted. Even if there's no impact, stating "NO" explicitly for each category is necessary. **Example of a better Impact:** > * Is new feature added? YES - Adds support for speed sensors to `sensortest`. > * Impact on user? YES - Users can now access speed sensor data using the `-s` option in `sensortest`. See the updated `sensortest` help for usage details. > * Impact on build? NO > * Impact on hardware? NO (Assumes existing speed sensor drivers are present) If new drivers are added, specify here. > * Impact on documentation? YES - The `sensortest` documentation will be updated to include the new `-s` option and usage examples. This documentation update is included in this PR. > * Impact on security? NO > * Impact on compatibility? NO > * Anything else to consider? NO **Testing:** * **Severely lacking:** Simply stating "FS3000" is not enough. What platform is this? What build host was used? Most importantly, where are the logs demonstrating the change? "Before" and "after" logs are essential to demonstrate that the change works as expected. **Example of a better Testing:** > I confirm that changes are verified on local setup and works as intended: > * Build Host(s): Linux (Ubuntu 20.04), x86_64, GCC 9.4.0 > * Target(s): sim:nsh config > > Testing logs before change: > ``` > $ sensortest -l > ... (list of sensors, no speed sensor present) > ``` > > Testing logs after change: > ``` > $ sensortest -l > ... (list of sensors, including the new speed sensor) > $ sensortest -s > Speed Sensor: <value> <units> > ``` In short, the provided PR description is a starting point but needs significant expansion to meet the NuttX requirements. Provide specific details, logs, and consider all the impact categories. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
