nuttxpr commented on PR #15326: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15326#issuecomment-2560897943
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides some information, it lacks crucial details. Here's what's missing: * **Summary:** It states *what* is being changed (renaming `lib_pathbuffer` to `lib_tempbuffer`), but not *why*. What problem does this renaming solve? What was the motivation for this change? How does the renaming work (is it a simple rename, or are there code changes associated with it)? Are there related NuttX issues? * **Impact:** Simply stating "None" is insufficient. Even a seemingly simple rename can have unforeseen impacts. The PR needs to explicitly address *each* impact point with justification. For example, why is there no impact on documentation? If there truly is no impact, explicitly state "NO" for each item. * **Testing:** While it mentions build commands, it provides no actual *testing logs*. Showing the output *before* and *after* the change is crucial to demonstrate that the change works as intended and doesn't introduce regressions. What functionality was tested? What were the expected results? Also, specifying only the build host is insufficient; the target architecture (e.g., sim:nsh) should be listed under *Target(s)* with details about the board and configuration. Furthermore, mentioning the build host operating system, CPU architecture, and compiler version is essential. In short, the PR needs to be significantly more detailed to meet the NuttX requirements. It needs to explain the rationale behind the change, justify the claimed lack of impact, and provide concrete evidence of testing. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
