cederom commented on code in PR #15304:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15304#discussion_r1901424224
##########
tools/Unix.mk:
##########
@@ -618,6 +619,40 @@ bootloader:
clean_bootloader:
$(Q) $(MAKE) -C $(ARCH_SRC) clean_bootloader
+checkpython3:
+ @if [ -z "$$(which python3)" ]; then \
+ echo "ERROR: python3 not found in PATH"; \
+ echo " Please install python3 or fix the PATH"; \
+ exit 1; \
+ fi
+
+# debug_info target flags to get diagnostic info without building nxdiag
application
+
+SYSINFO_PARSE_FLAGS = "$(realpath $(TOPDIR))"
+SYSINFO_PARSE_FLAGS += "-fsysinfo.h"
+
+SYSINFO_FLAGS = "-c"
+SYSINFO_FLAGS += "-p"
+SYSINFO_FLAGS += -f \""$(shell echo '$(CFLAGS)' | sed 's/"/\\\\\\"/g')"\"
+SYSINFO_FLAGS += \""$(shell echo '$(CXXFLAGS)' | sed 's/"/\\\\\\"/g')"\"
+SYSINFO_FLAGS += \""$(shell echo '$(LDFLAGS)' | sed 's/"/\\\\\\"/g')"\"
+
+ifneq ($(findstring esp,$(CONFIG_ARCH_CHIP)),)
+ARCH_ESP_HALDIR =
$(TOPDIR)$(DELIM)arch$(DELIM)$(CONFIG_ARCH)$(DELIM)src$(DELIM)chip$(DELIM)esp-hal-3rdparty
Review Comment:
* Hmm, but there is a Host and Target part right?
* Why do we want to remove recently added generic Host part script to the
application part?
* If this keeps things cleaner or other reason maybe a wrapper could be
added to the `nuttx/tools`? Would that script work even without prior
configuration?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
