nuttxpr commented on PR #15444: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15444#issuecomment-2574491389
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the basic NuttX requirements, although it could be more thorough. While it addresses the key points, it lacks specific details in several areas which would make review easier. Here's a breakdown: **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the *what* and *why* of the change, and the benefit (smaller size, easier debugging). * **Identifies Impacted Area:** Correctly identifies the impact as hardware-specific (qemu-armv7a). * **Mentions Testing:** Indicates testing was performed locally and that CI checks are expected. **Weaknesses:** * **Missing Detail in Summary:** The *how* is somewhat vague. It states "allows apps... to be built as executable type ELF files," but doesn't explain the mechanism of the change. What was modified to achieve this? * **Impact Lacks Detail:** The impact section needs significant expansion. While "qemu-armv7a" is mentioned, it doesn't specify whether other ARM architectures or boards are affected. All other impact categories are simply omitted (user impact, build process, documentation, security, compatibility). These should be explicitly stated as "NO" or "YES" with explanations. * **Insufficient Testing Information:** "Local checks" and "CI checks" are too general. The PR needs specific details about the host system (OS version, compiler version). The target information is slightly better but should specify the NuttX configuration used. Most importantly, the "Testing logs before change" and "Testing logs after change" sections are empty. These are crucial for demonstrating the change's effect and should include relevant output showing the difference in behavior. **Recommendation:** The PR author should add the missing details to strengthen it. Specifically: * **Summary:** Elaborate on the *how*. What files were changed? What build system modifications were made? * **Impact:** Address *all* impact categories. Even if the answer is "NO," it should be explicitly stated. For "hardware," be more specific about affected architectures/boards. * **Testing:** Provide detailed host and target information. Include actual log output demonstrating the change's effect (e.g., file sizes before/after, GDB debugging experience comparison). If logs are extensive, consider linking to a separate file or using a diff tool. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
