nuttxpr commented on PR #15448: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15448#issuecomment-2574751006
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR description does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it addresses some points, it lacks crucial details. Here's a breakdown of what's missing: * **Summary:** While it mentions the fix and the specific CID, it doesn't explain *why* the overflow occurred, *what* functional part of the gnss driver was changed, and *how* the change fixes the overflow. Think about the logic that led to the overflow and how your code prevents it. * **Impact:** It only mentions the affected driver. All other impact sections (user impact, build impact, hardware impact, documentation impact, security impact, compatibility impact) are missing. Even if the answer is "NO" for all, it should be explicitly stated. * **Testing:** Simply stating "CI" is insufficient. While CI testing is important, you must provide *specific* test results. Include: * Details about your local build host (OS, CPU architecture, compiler version) * Details about your target hardware or simulator (architecture, board, configuration) * Actual log output demonstrating the issue *before* the change and the corrected behavior *after* the change. The empty code blocks for logs need to be populated. Even simple logs showing the relevant values before and after the fix are better than nothing. **Example of a better Summary:** > This PR fixes an integer overflow error in the `gnss` driver related to handling of the `crefs` member of the `upper` structure (CID 1309501). The overflow occurred when `enable` was false, causing a negative value (-1) to be assigned to the 8-bit unsigned integer `upper->crefs`. This fix modifies the assignment logic to prevent assigning a negative value to the unsigned integer, ensuring the value remains within the valid range. **Example of a better Impact section (even if no impact):** > * Is new feature added? NO > * Impact on user: NO > * Impact on build: NO > * Impact on hardware: NO > * Impact on documentation: NO > * Impact on security: Potentially YES. The integer overflow could have led to unexpected behavior in the driver, although the specific security implications are unknown. > * Impact on compatibility: NO > * Anything else to consider: NO **Example of a better Testing section:** > I confirm that changes are verified on local setup and works as intended: > * Build Host(s): Linux (Ubuntu 20.04), x86_64, GCC 9.4.0 > * Target(s): sim:qemu-arm > Testing logs before change: > ``` > gnss_driver: enable = false, crefs = 255, assigned value = -1 (overflow) > ...other relevant logs... > ``` > Testing logs after change: > ``` > gnss_driver: enable = false, crefs = 255, assigned value = 0 > ...other relevant logs... > ``` By providing more complete information, reviewers can understand your changes better and ensure the quality and stability of the NuttX project. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
