nuttxpr commented on PR #15457:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15457#issuecomment-2576228977

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some sections 
could be more explicit.
   
   **Strengths:**
   
   * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the "why," "what," and "how" of 
the changes.  Referencing the related NuttX Apps PR is helpful.
   * **Impact Description:** The impact section covers several areas and 
explains the changes.
   * **Testing Performed:**  Confirmation of testing and referencing prior 
testing instructions is good.
   
   **Areas for Improvement (to make it even better):**
   
   * **Explicit "Yes/No" Answers:**  While the impact description is good, 
explicitly stating "YES" or "NO" at the beginning of each impact subsection 
would improve readability and ensure all points are addressed. For example:
       * Impact on user: YES (Users will need to adapt by using the updated 
commands for the RISC-V QEMU as documented.)
       * Impact on build: YES (The rv-virt:python defconfig is modified.)
       * Impact on hardware: NO
       * Impact on documentation: YES (Documentation is updated to reflect the 
changes in the QEMU commands and the availability of the socket module.)
       * Impact on security: NO (Assuming no security implications were 
introduced. If there are any, they MUST be documented)
       * Impact on compatibility: Potentially YES (if any existing scripts rely 
on previous QEMU behavior).  Clarify this point.
   * **Testing Logs:**  While referencing the other PR's testing instructions 
is acceptable, including *some* example logs (even abbreviated ones) directly 
in the PR description is strongly recommended. This provides immediate context 
and evidence of successful testing.
   * **Build Host Details:** Be more specific about the Build Host(s) used for 
testing. For example: "Linux, x86_64, GCC 12.2.1"
   * **Target Details:** Be more explicit with the Target(s) tested:  
"sim:rv-virt:python"
   
   
   By addressing these minor points, the PR will be even clearer and easier to 
review.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to