no1wudi commented on PR #2487: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2487#issuecomment-2580536405
> My gut feel is that we should do it the Zephyr way. But make it POSIX-like. Thus we should drop `nuttx-embedded-hal` altogether :-) Thanks for your information, personally, I also lean towards providing NuttX APIs for Rust programs in a manner similar to Zephyr. This approach allows for full utilization of existing implementations and is based on POSIX-like APIs (entirely file operation-based). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
