nuttxpr commented on PR #15505:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15505#issuecomment-2586160788

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   No.  This PR description lacks crucial information required by the NuttX 
guidelines.
   
   Here's what's missing:
   
   * **Summary:**  While it links a prior PR, it doesn't explain *what* the 
regression is.  What functionality was broken? How does this PR fix it? What 
part of the code was changed and how?
   * **Impact:**  The current entry just lists a file path.  It needs to 
explicitly answer all the impact questions (user impact, build impact, hardware 
impact, documentation, security, compatibility).  Use "NO" or "YES" followed by 
a description if yes.
   * **Testing:**  Linking to a CI issue isn't sufficient.  It needs to specify 
the *local* test setup used (host OS, compiler, target architecture and board) 
and provide *actual* before/after testing logs demonstrating the fix.  Simply 
pointing to a CI run doesn't show what specific tests were run locally and 
their results.
   
   
   The author needs to substantially expand this PR description to be accepted.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to