nuttxpr commented on PR #15547: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15547#issuecomment-2590116379
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements based on the information provided. Here's why: * **Insufficient Summary:** "Use small lock to protect usbdev and endpoint in AVR" is a title, not a summary. It doesn't explain *why* this change is necessary (bug fix? performance improvement?), *how* it works (what kind of lock? what was the previous protection mechanism?), or link related issues. * **Missing Impact Details:** While the file impacted is listed, the other impact categories are incomplete. The author needs to explicitly state YES/NO and provide descriptions for *all* impacts, even if the answer is NO. Just listing a file path isn't sufficient. For example, does this impact the user? Does it change the build process? Does it have security implications? * **Inadequate Testing:** "CI" is not sufficient testing information. The PR needs to specify the *specific* build hosts and targets tested *locally* before submitting. It also lacks "before" and "after" testing logs to demonstrate the change's effect. Relying solely on CI is not acceptable. The PR needs significant revision to meet the requirements. The author should expand on all sections to provide the necessary context and evidence for their changes. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
