nuttxpr commented on PR #2963:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2963#issuecomment-2604279772

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements as described.  While 
it provides a summary and impact assessment, it lacks crucial information.
   
   Here's what's missing:
   
   * **Summary:**  Lacks clarity on *why* this change is necessary.  Simply 
stating it's part of a larger effort isn't sufficient.  What problem does this 
restructuring solve?  How does it benefit the project? What functionality is 
being changed (even if it's just directory structure)? How *exactly* does the 
move work (e.g., are symbolic links used? Is it a pure move?).  The linked PR 
provides context, but the PR itself should be self-contained.
   
   * **Impact:** While it mentions the affected folders, it lacks crucial 
"YES/NO" answers for most impact categories.  Even if the answer is "NO," it 
should be explicitly stated. For example:
       * Impact on user: NO
       * Impact on build:  Potentially YES (if any build scripts rely on the 
old paths). This needs clarification.
       * Impact on hardware: NO
       * Impact on documentation: Potentially YES (if any documentation refers 
to the old paths). This needs investigation and explicit statement.
       * Impact on security: NO
       * Impact on compatibility: Potentially YES. This change *could* break 
existing user setups or scripts that rely on the old paths. This needs 
investigation.
   * **Testing:** "CI test" is insufficient.  While CI is important,  the PR 
should provide specific examples of tests run *locally* to validate the change. 
 What were the results before and after the move?  Show concrete evidence that 
the restructuring didn't break anything.  Including the build host and target 
information is also necessary.
   
   In short, the PR needs to be more thorough and explicit in addressing all 
the requirements.  It relies too heavily on the linked PR for context.  Each PR 
should stand on its own.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to