nuttxpr commented on PR #15638: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15638#issuecomment-2606343973
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some minor improvements could be made. **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the change's purpose (adding coredump support for x86-64), the affected code (implicitly the coredump mechanism), and how it works (by enabling it for the architecture). * **Impact Description:** While concise, the impact section covers the essential aspects. The config changes clearly show the build impact. The testing section demonstrates the user impact (how to trigger and use coredumps). * **Detailed Testing:** The testing section is excellent. It provides the config changes, build instructions, steps to reproduce the issue, and the gdb output demonstrating that the core dump is working as expected. This allows others to easily reproduce and validate the changes. **Areas for Improvement:** * **Explicitly State Impact:** While the impact is *implied*, it would be better to explicitly state "YES" or "NO" for each impact category and provide more detail, even if it's just "N/A". For example: * Impact on user: YES (Users can now generate and debug core dumps on x86-64) * Impact on build: YES (Requires changes to the configuration as shown in the testing section). * Impact on hardware: YES (Specifically enables this functionality for x86-64 architecture). * Impact on documentation: NO (If no documentation updates are needed) or YES (if documentation needs to be updated; in that case, provide a link or description of the updated documentation). * Impact on security: NO/YES (Justify your answer. Core dumps *could* have security implications if they expose sensitive information, but this is unlikely in most NuttX use cases). * Impact on compatibility: NO (Unless there are known compatibility issues). * **Build Host Information:** In the testing section, provide more detail about the build host environment. e.g., "Linux, x86_64, GCC 12.2". * **Before Change Logs:** Although you mention capturing logs before the change, you haven't included them. Ideally, you should show that coredumps *weren't* working before this change. If this isn't possible (because the feature didn't exist), explicitly state that. By making these minor adjustments, the PR would be even stronger and easier for reviewers to assess. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
