cederom commented on PR #840: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/840#issuecomment-2625617330
> @raiden00pl: @cederom Isn't MicroPython much lighter solution than CPython? I don't think these two can be treated equally. I'll change my mind if CPython can run on stm32 :) Allright, so we want the MicroPython too :-) Just asking to see if the stuff is still relevant :-) In upcoming months I have no time to play unfortunately to do any updates, sorry, but in order to have absolutely minimalistic implementation that is board independent: 1. I still think this implementation port should be kept as minimal as possible. 2. The hardware access should happen over NuttX's `/dev` and `ioctl()` subsystem based on exposed board configuration not the existing peripheral drivers for any specific board as part of MicroPython firmware packages. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
