nuttxpr commented on PR #15853: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15853#issuecomment-2663851137
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some minor improvements could be made. Here's a breakdown: **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the "why," "what," and "how" of the changes. The reference to the previous PR (#15816) is helpful for context. * **Impact Assessment:** The impact section addresses all the required points. The description of the user impact (KConfig changes) is particularly important. * **Testing Information:** The testing section provides information on the host and targets used for testing. Mentioning specific defconfigs tested is good. **Areas for Improvement:** * **Missing Issue References:** While the previous PR is mentioned, it's beneficial to link a related NuttX or NuttX Apps issue if one exists. Even if this PR is purely a refactoring following from a previous issue, referencing that issue is helpful for traceability. * **Testing Logs:** The PR claims testing logs are included, but the provided template sections are empty. Actual log snippets demonstrating functionality before and after the change should be included. This provides concrete evidence of successful testing. If logs are too extensive, consider providing a link to an external log file or CI run. * **Hardware Impact Clarification:** The impact on hardware states "Affects only ESP32S3 boards." However, the summary mentions modifying ESP32. This discrepancy should be clarified. Does it affect *both* ESP32 and ESP32S3 or just ESP32S3? If ESP32S3 was already transitioned in the previous PR, that needs to be stated more explicitly, as the current wording implies this PR is the first change for the ESP32S3. * **Build Impact Nuance:** While the practical build impact is minimal, the movement of build instructions _is_ a change, even if minor. Acknowledging this explicitly and mentioning the specific files affected adds clarity. **Recommendation:** The PR is close to meeting the requirements. Adding the missing issue references, including actual testing logs (or links to them), and clarifying the hardware and build impact will strengthen the PR and make it easier for reviewers to assess. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
