nuttxpr commented on PR #15855:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15855#issuecomment-2664771979

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   Yes, this PR appears to mostly meet the NuttX requirements, but is missing 
some key information.
   
   Here's a breakdown of what's good and what needs improvement:
   
   **Strengths:**
   
   * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the "why," "what," and "how" of 
the change. The link to the ESP-IDF guide provides good context.
   * **Concise Impact Description:**  The impact description is brief but gets 
the point across.
   * **Testing Mentions Targets:**  The testing section identifies specific 
targets.
   
   **Weaknesses:**
   
   * **Missing Issue References:**  If this relates to any existing NuttX 
issues, those should be linked in the Summary.
   * **Impact Section Incomplete:**  Several "Impact" fields are left blank 
(build, hardware, documentation, security, compatibility).  Even if the answer 
is "NO," it should be explicitly stated.  The current description focuses 
solely on the user impact and ignores potential impacts on other aspects.
   * **Insufficient Testing Detail:**  While targets are mentioned, there are 
no actual logs provided.  "Before" and "after" logs demonstrating the change 
are crucial.  Furthermore, just stating "build against" isn't sufficient. What 
was the observed behavior? Did the change have the intended effect? Quantify 
the improvement if possible. The rationale for skipping ESP32S2 should be in 
the Impact section (hardware impact).
   * **Build Host Information Missing:** The testing section lacks information 
about the build host used (OS, CPU, compiler).
   * **Missing Contributing Guidelines Adherence Confirmation:**  While the 
note is there, there's no explicit statement confirming adherence to the 
guidelines.
   
   
   **Recommendations for Improvement:**
   
   1. **Complete the Impact Section:**  Explicitly address *all* impact 
categories, even if the answer is "NO."  Justify the "NO" if necessary.  For 
example, if there's no documentation impact, state "Impact on documentation: 
NO.  This change does not require documentation updates."  Explain the ESP32S2 
exclusion under hardware impact.
   
   2. **Provide Detailed Testing Logs:** Include actual "before" and "after" 
logs demonstrating the effect of the change. Quantify the improvement in 
startup time if possible.  Show the commands used for building and testing.
   
   3. **Include Build Host Information:** Specify the OS, CPU, and compiler 
version used for the build.
   
   4. **Link Related Issues (if any):**  If no issues exist, explicitly state 
that.
   
   5. **Explicitly Confirm Adherence to Contributing Guidelines:** Add a 
statement like "I confirm that this PR adheres to the NuttX Contributing 
Guidelines."
   
   
   By addressing these points, the PR will be significantly stronger and easier 
to review.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to