keever50 commented on issue #15942: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/15942#issuecomment-2726471772
@acassis whats your thought on this? There are some ioctl commands that really need to be changed. Such as PN532IOC_SEND_CMD_READ_PASSIVE which... does not take any arguments for some reason. It should. It also requires a timeout, which is fixed to 0, which makes no sense either. But it is a crucial thing for this to function. But yeah this makes it a breaking change, which isn't hugely welcome in NuttX. But this driver doesn't seem to be used from what i can see? How big of a deal would it be if its interface changes? It is a challenge to work around it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
