nakajimayoshi commented on issue #11907: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11907#issuecomment-2732211545
> I think that NuttX should be considered as a operating system and standard library base. That's great! Don't know how it relates to this conversation though 😄 . > I consider dependence on RUST in Linux kernel and other projects at significant threat to long term open source sustainability until there is full featured RUST compiler based on fully GNU or other copyleft licensed compiler cc @lupyuen I think there is some misinterpretation of the original comment. Whether or not to include rust in the NuttX kernel is an entirely separate discussion, and not what I care about. The goal is to have user Rust applications use only cargo for project and .spk builds. I.e. if and ONLY if you're making a user application with rust, then you manage the project with cargo, rather than make. (This can still call make under the hood, but the point is that the developer facing build system is all invoked via cargo). I don't really want to get into the whole "is Rust even safe for long term OSS development" because I'm talking exclusively about applications, not kernel code. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
