nuttxpr commented on PR #3030: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3030#issuecomment-2736663569
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the basic NuttX requirements, although it could be improved with more detail. Here's a breakdown: **Strengths:** * **Addresses a clear problem:** Fixing a broken build is a valuable contribution. * **Provides context:** Explains why the build broke (upstream lacking lely configs). * **Improved maintainability:** Splitting changes into patches is good practice. * **Confirms testing:** States that the build now works. **Weaknesses (and suggestions for improvement):** * **Summary lacks specifics:** While it mentions fixing the build, it doesn't detail *what* was fixed. What specific build errors were resolved? What changes were made in each patch? Be more explicit. * **Impact is too brief:** "fix lely build" is insufficient. While there's likely no user-facing change, the PR description should explicitly state this. Also, mentioning the affected architectures/boards is crucial. Even if it's just "This change affects builds that include the lely-canopen library," it's better than nothing. Be explicit about "NO" for all other impact categories. * **Testing lacks detail:** "local configs" is vague. Specify the OS, CPU architecture, compiler, NuttX version, target architecture, board, and configuration used for testing. Include relevant snippets of the build output (or ideally, a link to a CI log) *before* and *after* the change, demonstrating the fix. Empty code blocks don't help. If the logs are extensive, summarize the key differences. **Example Improvements:** **Summary:** > This series of commits fixes the lely-canopen build for both `make` and `cmake`. Previously, the build was broken due to API changes in lely that were not reflected in the NuttX integration. These changes were split into the following patches: > * 0001-Fix-XYZ-incompatibility.patch: Addresses the incompatibility between the lely API and the NuttX driver by... > * 0002-Update-lely-commit-tag.patch: Updates the lely submodule to the latest master commit (abcdef123) which includes... > > This fixes build errors related to [describe the specific errors, e.g., missing symbols, type mismatches]. NuttX upstream doesn't currently include any default lely configurations, which has led to these build issues accumulating over time. **Impact:** > * Is new feature added? NO > * Is existing feature changed? YES (lely-canopen library build fixed) > * Impact on user (will user need to adapt to change)? NO > * Impact on build (will build process change)? YES (lely-canopen library now builds successfully on configurations using it). > * Impact on hardware (will arch(s) / board(s) / driver(s) change)? YES (affects any architecture/board configured to use lely-canopen). > * Impact on documentation (is update required / provided)? NO > * Impact on security (any sort of implications)? NO > * Impact on compatibility (backward/forward/interoperability)? NO (maintains compatibility with existing lely-canopen applications, assuming they were built against a compatible lely version). > * Anything else to consider? NO **Testing:** > I confirm that changes are verified on a local setup and work as intended: > * Build Host: Linux (Ubuntu 20.04), x86_64, GCC 9.4.0 > * Target: sim:nsh > > Testing logs before change (excerpt showing key error): > ``` > ... > /path/to/nuttx/drivers/can/can.c:123: error: 'lely_xyz' undeclared... > ... > ``` > > Testing logs after change: > ``` > ... > Build complete. > ... > ``` By providing this level of detail, you make it much easier for reviewers to understand and evaluate your changes, increasing the likelihood of a smooth and timely merge. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
