cederom commented on issue #16248: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16248#issuecomment-2822725650
Thank you @stbenn for this idea and work! You are probably the best person to decide as you know the details best :-) I think @raiden00pl is also using STM chips and can provide good feedback :-) If you think that STM32H5 is specific enough to have its own implementation then it should be noted in the documentation and go that path to get most out of the hardware. Note however that in the best situation existing code from other STM architectures should be portable to H5 from the upper half driver perspective (i.e. application). How things are implemented in the lower half driver is hardware specific. Do I understand correctly that STMH5 somehow implies DMA implementation other from existing implementations in NuttX in general or just other STM chips? Would it be possible to use peripherals "the old way" if no DMA is used? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
