nuttxpr commented on PR #16253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16253#issuecomment-2824031538

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some sections 
could be more explicit.
   
   **Strengths:**
   
   * **Clear Summary:** The summary identifies the problem (inaccurate memory 
usage reporting), the affected code (linker output), and the root cause 
(upstream Pico SDK bug).  The upstream bug link is helpful.
   * **Impact is Addressed (mostly):**  The impact on the build process 
(changed linker output) is clear. Other impacts appear to be negligible and 
marked "NO," which is acceptable if accurate.
   * **Testing Provided:** "Before" and "After" logs clearly demonstrate the 
change in behavior.  Including build host and target details would strengthen 
this section.
   
   **Areas for Improvement (if applicable):**
   
   * **Summary - "How does the change exactly work?"**  While the summary 
explains *what* changes, it doesn't explain *how* the PR fixes the issue. A 
brief sentence explaining the fix applied within the Pico SDK or NuttX would be 
helpful.
   * **Testing - More Details:**  The testing section should specify the build 
host (OS, compiler) and the target (architecture, board, configuration). 
Example:  "Build Host: macOS Ventura, clang 14.0.0.  Target: Raspberry Pi Pico, 
sim:hello configuration."
   * **Explicitly Address All Impact Points:** Even if the impact is "NO," it's 
best to explicitly state it for each item. For example:
       * Impact on user: NO (The output change only affects developers during 
the build process).
       * Impact on hardware: NO
       * Impact on documentation: NO
       * Impact on security: NO
       * Impact on compatibility: NO
   * **Consider "Anything else to consider?"** This section allows you to 
highlight unusual circumstances or potential side effects, even if minor.  If 
nothing applies, stating "None" is good practice.
   
   
   By adding these minor details, the PR will be even clearer and easier for 
reviewers to evaluate.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to