pussuw commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2085168370
##########
net/local/local_recvmsg.c:
##########
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static void local_recvctl(FAR struct local_conn_s *conn,
count = peer->lc_cfpcount;
for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
{
- fds[i] = file_dup(peer->lc_cfps[i], 0,
+ fds[i] = file_dup(peer->lc_cfps[i], 0, /* TODO: WHat about this ? */
Review Comment:
I left these TODO comments here so that someone can explain to me what these
file_dup/file_dup2 calls are supposed to do. Is it OK to leave them like this
or do I need to "fix" something.
Because now fd just points to a file, there is no need to make copies (like
how file_dup2 works).
If it's fine to leave the file_dup() / file_dup2() calls as is, then I'll
just remove the TODOs in the final patch.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
