jlaitine commented on PR #16813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16813#issuecomment-3158455087

   Hrm. Didn't compile with clang of course. Does someone understand why the 
atomic function parameters and atomic_t are defined as "volatile" in the first 
place in NuttX? I don't think that it is ever correct with atomic variables?
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to