jlaitine commented on PR #16813: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16813#issuecomment-3158455087
Hrm. Didn't compile with clang of course. Does someone understand why the atomic function parameters and atomic_t are defined as "volatile" in the first place in NuttX? I don't think that it is ever correct with atomic variables? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org