tmedicci commented on PR #16673:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#issuecomment-3189671301

   > > @tmedicci ; would you be able to test it with the one patch I pushed on 
top of this branch? I still need to test and review it more thoroughly so it is 
not ready to merge as is. I would like to hear how it works on real esp32 HW.
   > > I just tested it on some other HW's that it shouldn't break anything.
   > 
   > I can confirm that the test described at [#16673 
(comment)](https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16673#issuecomment-3188301312) 
**now runs successfully** (after applying 
[bd71979](https://github.com/apache/nuttx/commit/bd71979987f2717e6354e3c8cea2a6fc09d461bf))
 even without my diff patch. I just triggered a new pipeline to evaluate the 
overall performance.
   
   Everything seems fine with the new approach. All tests have passed! 
@fdcavalcanti , can you please double check?
   
   The branch used for that is 
https://github.com/tmedicci/nuttx/tree/fix_smp_scheduling_2 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to