cederom commented on PR #3200: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3200#issuecomment-3483613044
> @fdcavalcanti: Seems those boards are setting a custom MCUBoot version, but will fail to build due because this PR adds a new source file. > > ``` > - ./boards/arm/nrf52/nrf52840-dk/configs/mcuboot_loader > defconfig:CONFIG_MCUBOOT_VERSION="414ac87cfd8d9cedeb781f812ad6f5072e6d8a39" > - ./boards/arm/nrf52/nrf52832-dk/configs/mcuboot_loader_minimal > defconfig:CONFIG_MCUBOOT_VERSION="414ac87cfd8d9cedeb781f812ad6f5072e6d8a39" > - ./boards/arm/nrf52/nrf52832-dk/configs/mcuboot_loader > defconfig:CONFIG_MCUBOOT_VERSION="414ac87cfd8d9cedeb781f812ad6f5072e6d8a39" @raiden00pl ? :-) > - ./boards/arm/imxrt/imxrt1064-evk/configs/mcuboot-loader > defconfig:CONFIG_MCUBOOT_VERSION="414ac87cfd8d9cedeb781f812ad6f5072e6d8a39" @JianyuWang0623 @hujun260 @jturnsek ? :-) > - ./boards/arm/stm32h7/nucleo-h743zi/configs/mcuboot-loader > defconfig:CONFIG_MCUBOOT_VERSION="414ac87cfd8d9cedeb781f812ad6f5072e6d8a39 @JianyuWang0623 @raiden00pl @davids5 @xiaoxiang781216 @tito97sp ? :-) > Not sure how we can approach this. Any ideas? I guess we should use common version for all boards as you propose @fdcavalcanti, but maybe there are exceptions for some boards, maybe these are just leftovers where was not common mcuboot yet? If committers of the code have insight and board at hand and could verify if the updated project wide mcuboot version fits these specific boards then we could remove board/config specific mcuboot versions and use one common version. I have nRF52832-DK, nRF52840-DK, and NUCLEO-h755ZI, but no imxrt1064-evk (~200EUR). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
