anchao commented on PR #17468: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/17468#issuecomment-3646399258
> @anchao seems like the impact is not so negative as you thought. I think it is fine! What you think? @acassis This result is SMP, not AMP. Also, you can see that this commit contains many changes to nxsched_get_tcb/nxsched_put_tcb, and these new lines of code are definitely impacting performance. 1. Furthermore, in operating systems with defined tasks, task reference counting is useless and only increases the system load. 2. I wonder if all of you are aware that NuttX offers no competitive edge over Zephyr and FreeRTOS in terms of performance metrics such as thread creation, context switching, interrupt response, and semaphore operations. Given this fact, why should we still impose such overheads on NuttX users? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
