acassis commented on PR #18260: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/18260#issuecomment-3820980920
> Frankly speaking, the NOxxx_FORWARD is quite confusing, although the purpose is to backward older code. Most user will consider upgrade nuttx app and kernel at the same time. The flag without "NO" flag is the one that more user friendly. For long term consideration, nuttx should user flag without "NO". Which rule has higher priority in nuttx world? Do right thing or backward : ) @masc2008 good point. Although PACKET_NOT_FORWARDED is used internally in the kernel, it is not used by applications. So, fell free to suggest doing the right thing! ;-) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
